k3vr the vigalante byt his own words

post 212

gee Crow its eesm well aplied to ME you insist Mike is entitled todue process before being declared a criminal but Karol is Not

post 212
The word vigilante is grossly misapplied here.

Definition: A vigilante is a person who ignores due process of law and enacts their own form of justice in response to a perception of insufficient response by the authorities.

I'll go over the fine points again:

#1. As Jeff mentioned, the FCC will not respond to complaints by or on behalf of VE7KFM. That's the first response by our authorities.

#2. Under FCC rules, interpreted by the FCC, his transmissions constitute harmful interference. That's a second response by our authorities.

#3. The FCC special counsel said to "ignore the fruitcake" at the FCC's Dayton forum. That's a 3rd response by our authorities.

#4. The FCC has taken no action against anyone engaged in a legitimate qso, who is using his callsign, and talking over the fruitcake. That's a 4th response by our authorities.

#5. The FCC has taken action against numerous individuals in support of the fruitcake. That's a 5th response by our authorities and that's more than enough for me to see the forest through the trees.

#6. Industry Canada doesn't care and they don't want to get involved. That's a direct quote. Whatever they think is a moot point in the US.

Finally, using mere common sense, the FCC isn't going to sanction someone for talking over the fruitcake.